top of page

MA Thesis

Every website has a story, and your visitors want to hear yours. This space is a great opportunity to give a full background on who you are and what your site has to offer. Double click on the text box to start editing your content and make sure to add all the relevant details you want site visitors to know.

If you’re a business, talk about how you started and share your professional journey. Explain your core values, your commitment to customers, and how you stand out from the crowd. Add a photo, gallery, or video for even more engagement.


In this thesis, I argue that the nature of a topmost phase head influences the feature specification and syntactic realization of layers merging both below and above the phase head. I base my argumentation on nominalizations in nominative-accusative and ergative-absolutive languages, starting from the root domain to the DP projection. I discuss the argument and event structure, aspectual values, agreement patterns, morphological properties, and mechanics of word formation. The core generalizations are formed on the basis of the Serbian language, as a representative of the nominative-accusative alignment, and Yucatec Mayan, a language surfacing with the ergative-absolutive pattern. Providing novel, original data, I identify and address several puzzles in domains of aspectual distinctions, argument and event structure, gender and number agreement, and the height of affixation.

I argue that Serbian, in contrast to languages such as English, German, and Spanish that have both n-based and D-based nominalizations in the typology offered in Alexiadou, Iordăchioaia, and Schäfer (2011) and Alexiadou (2020b) employs a single nominalization strategy, as all deverbal nominals are instances of n-based nominalizations.

I demonstrate that the presence of the nominalizing head n that embeds varying amounts of verbal structure (Alexiadou, 2001 and subsequent work) influences both the verbal layers below it and the nominal layers above it. I show that Serbian obeys the ergativity requirement proposed in Alexiadou (2001) and provide further evidence that vP under n is distinct from the vP under T. Furthermore, on the basis of the argument structure of active and passive clauses, as well as nominalizations and participles, I demonstrate that v under T can assign accusative case to its internal argument, v under n can assign genitive, while v under a in participles lacks the capability of case assignment.





  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
bottom of page